If you employ fewer than 15 people and you're dismissing someone for conduct or performance reasons, the Small Business Fair Dismissal Code is what protects you from an unfair dismissal claim, provided you actually follow it. Most small business owners have heard of it. Fewer have read what it actually requires, which is exactly how good-faith dismissals turn into costly claims.
Here's what the Code covers, and where businesses typically trip up.
What the Code actually is
It's a short, practical checklist published by the Fair Work Ombudsman, and it exists specifically because small businesses don't run formal HR processes the way larger employers do. If you follow it, the Fair Work Commission will generally find a dismissal was fair, even without the paperwork trail a bigger company might have. The full code sits on the Fair Work Ombudsman's unfair dismissal page, and it's worth reading in full before you act, not after.
The two situations it covers
Summary dismissal
Summary dismissal, for serious misconduct such as theft, fraud, violence or serious breaches of workplace health and safety. You can dismiss without notice or warning here, but only if the conduct is genuinely serious enough, and you need to have believed on reasonable grounds that it happened.
Other dismissals
Other dismissals, for underperformance or lesser conduct issues. This is where most disputes actually happen, and where the Code asks for more than a gut feeling.
What "following the Code" looks like in practice
What the Code asks for
For a performance or conduct dismissal that isn't summary, you generally need to have given the employee a warning that their job is at risk, given them a reasonable chance to fix the problem or respond, and given them a genuine opportunity to have a support person present in any discussion about the dismissal, if they ask for one. None of this needs to be a formal process with letterhead and legal review, but it does need to have actually happened, and you need to be able to describe what happened if challenged.
Where small businesses usually get caught out
The gap is rarely bad intent. It's usually one of three things. The warning was verbal and vague ("you need to lift your game") rather than specific about what needed to change and by when. There's no record at all, so if it's disputed later, it's your word against theirs. Or the final conversation happens the same day a manager decides they've had enough, with no lead-up the employee could point to as fair warning.
A habit worth building fixes some of this: after any real performance conversation, send a short follow-up email or note summarising what was discussed, what needs to change, and by when. That's not the whole answer though, it protects the paperwork, not necessarily the person. Genuine procedural fairness means actually giving someone a real chance to improve, not just going through the motions of a warning you've already privately decided won't change anything. That distinction matters more than most business owners realise, and it's usually the harder judgment call, not the easier one.
It's a shield, not a shortcut
Worth being direct about this. The Code exists to protect genuine, reasonable dismissals from being unfairly punished by process technicalities, not to make it easy to remove someone you've simply lost patience with. If the underlying reason for the dismissal isn't sound, following the Code's steps won't save you. The Fair Work Commission looks at the substance of the decision as well as the process.
It's also worth being honest about something else: these situations are genuinely nuanced, and treating the Code as a simple checklist to tick off is its own risk. Every dismissal carries a different level of risk depending on the person, the history, the reason and how it's likely to be received, and different business owners will have different appetites for that risk. What looks straightforward on paper, a warning, a chance to respond, a support person if asked, can be a lot harder to execute well in a real conversation with a real person whose job and income are on the line. These conversations tend to deserve more care, not less, and often benefit from an outside, experienced perspective precisely because the stakes for everyone involved are high.
Official resources
The full code sits on the Fair Work Ombudsman's unfair dismissal page.
If you're heading toward a dismissal
The stakes of getting this wrong are real, and they go further than the claim itself. Beyond the time, money and headspace an unfair dismissal claim costs regardless of the outcome, a badly handled termination has a way of rippling through the rest of your team. People notice how an exit was handled, even when they only see the edges of it, and it shapes how safe they feel raising their own performance issues, how much they trust the business to be fair, and whether they believe a similar conversation with them would be handled with the same care. That impact on culture and trust is easy to underestimate and hard to undo.
If you're not sure whether what you've documented so far is enough, or you want someone to sanity check the situation before you act, that's exactly the kind of conversation we have with clients regularly.
Book a free consultation or get in touch at hello@happyhumans.com.au.
Disclaimer
This article is general information only. It doesn't take into account your specific circumstances and isn't a substitute for professional legal or HR advice. We make every effort to keep our Insights accurate and current, but award rates and Fair Work Commission decisions can change, and we can't guarantee this information is complete or up to date at the time you're reading it. Nothing on this page should be relied on as legal advice, and nothing here forms part of a professional engagement with happy humans.